Monday, January 31, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Correcting Labia Minora Repair During Delivery
The recently traveled
I have somewhat abandoned this blog, but to keep my four readers, here are reading a text on which was published in Rereading . If you want to read further, please click here . If you want to read here, read on. ----------------------------------------------
-------
The recently traveled
Read to me has always meant a "get out", a "go-for-other-side", a journey to reach hand and a child that has fascinated me. As a child I read and reread a collection of Russian tales and all those who read classics all children, but I remember particularly White Fang, Jack London, because I read on a car trip Maturin Caracas. A trip within a trip. We used to go to Caracas to visit my grandmother every August or Christmas holidays. It was a journey tediosísimo, eight hours in the middle of a warm and wet road. And to not get bored we had food, books, toys, music. I remember how hard it was to read in the curves that are before or after Rio Chico, but still I could not detach myself from White Fang, those dogs pulling sleds, blood in the snow, of friendship. I wept bitter tears for that friendship mixed with the sweat produced by the heat of a road through huge trees, fried, Chicharronero, vines, Araguaney, sales taxes, areperas, chirping crickets and even wildflowers: the "birds of paradise grew (and I still grow) in that part where the road enters a dense and steamy jungle. I was the vaporón to snow in the poor White Fang struggled with other dogs and his orphan. And the snow vaporón which appeared suddenly something interesting in the window or talk to my parents. I think that's the image that the act of reading it to me: a being here and being there, a duality that fascinates me, a living other lives. As anyone who lives in two realities, one who reads your reality ends up polluting the books and vice versa. So, this road was some snow and White Fang looked a lot like dogs "frightened-with-the-plate" in areperas El Corozo. That's an amazing experience and hallucinogenic. Addictive.
Amos Oz says that when we travel we can see and geraniums sills, doors and people from black and fast, but we can not go home. Read, however, is to enter those houses, those rooms, watch what they eat, how they sleep or love or suffer the other. These men in black and fast. These women sills dry, they close the windows to the curiosity of our eyes, shaking the geraniums. Following Oz, I would say that reading is get to where we are denied entry. Travel is to imagine life beyond the eyelashes but reading is truly enter. Yet this does not mean that's not worth traveling: if I get to choose between a plane ticket and a book, needless to say what I choose, what I mean is that reading is a journey into the interior and mystery. The trip completed.
Amos Oz says that when we travel we can see and geraniums sills, doors and people from black and fast, but we can not go home. Read, however, is to enter those houses, those rooms, watch what they eat, how they sleep or love or suffer the other. These men in black and fast. These women sills dry, they close the windows to the curiosity of our eyes, shaking the geraniums. Following Oz, I would say that reading is get to where we are denied entry. Travel is to imagine life beyond the eyelashes but reading is truly enter. Yet this does not mean that's not worth traveling: if I get to choose between a plane ticket and a book, needless to say what I choose, what I mean is that reading is a journey into the interior and mystery. The trip completed.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Breville Breadmaster Bb300
TONOLEC TONOLEC
Along with the voice of our partners, you can feel the presence of Arturo Bonin in reading a text book "Feet in the Mud. Dialogues in People Q'oma " and some beautiful sounds of the Chaco forest. 
The program is edited to relive various moments Trojans.
Led by Trojans System, the next Monday 31 January at 18 pm Goblins, the duo Tonolec bring back sounds Q'oma to studies FM La Tribu. In a program where you can also hear different notes raised in and Castelli Villa Rio Bermejito with brothers Q'oma area and also in the camp of July Av.9 being carried out by the Formosa Q'oma brothers along with dozens of other communities and social organizations. 
Along with the voice of our partners, you can feel the presence of Arturo Bonin in reading a text book "Feet in the Mud. Dialogues in People Q'oma " and some beautiful sounds of the Chaco forest. The program is edited to relive various moments Trojans.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Free Blueprints Swing
SCALE OF THE YEAR 2011
In Gazette Thursday, January 27, 2011 , has published the schedule of traffic accidents in 2011, by Resolution of January 20, 2011, the Directorate General of Insurance and Pension Funds, which are published on the amounts of compensation for death, permanent injury and temporary disability that will result from applying in 2011 the system for assessment of damages caused to people in road accidents.
that resolution can access directly from this link allowance.
For the text of the Law on Liability and Insurance in the Circulation of Motor Vehicles, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 8 / 2004, dated October 29 states that: 1) annually, with effect from Jan. each year, must be updated amounts for compensation to be found in the system for the assessment of damages caused to people in road accidents and, 2) otherwise, will be automatically updated in the percentage of the general price index consumption for the previous calendar year.
.
.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Victoria Secret Bra Oil
THE JUDICIAL ERROR AND PERFORMANCE FREAK OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
caused damage any property or right of judicial error and deriving or arising from irregularities in the administration of justice have differential treatment under Title V of the Organic Law of Judicial Power in Articles 292 et seq. Expressing the art. 292 of the Judicial Power that:
1. The damage caused to any property or rights by judicial error as well as those arising from irregularities in the administration of justice to all those affected will be entitled to compensation from the State, except in cases of force majeure under the provisions of this title.
2. In any case, the alleged harm must be actual, economic evaluations and individual in relation to a person or group of people.
3. The mere revocation or annulment of judgments alone does not necessarily entitled to compensation.
The mistake is in terms which recognized the case of TS-statements of 16 June 1995, May 6 and June 26 of 1996 and thirteen of June 1990 and nine, "the judge to disregard the undisputed data in a relationship that breaks the harmony of the legal order or decision misinterprets the legal system, if an interpretation is not sustainable by any method of interpretation applicable in practice judicial.
The irregularities in the administration of justice includes, for Meanwhile, any defect in the performance of courts or tribunals, designed as organic complex which comprises a number of people, services, facilities and activities. Abnormal functioning of a particular case is removed, the wrong decision, to pursue a separate legal treatment. "
is no doubt that the abnormal functioning of the administration of justice is subject to our legal system to a different treatment of judicial error: a) while compensation of error should be preceded by a court decision expressly to recognize, under Article 293.1 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary; b) the claim for damages resulting from irregularities in the administration of justice does not require a prior judicial declaration, but is made directly to the Ministry of Justice in the manner prescribed in Article 292 of the Organic Law Judicial Branch, through a claim of liability on the administration of justice. 
The difference between judicial error and irregularities in the administration justice.
caused damage any property or right of judicial error and deriving or arising from irregularities in the administration of justice have differential treatment under Title V of the Organic Law of Judicial Power in Articles 292 et seq. Expressing the art. 292 of the Judicial Power that:
1. The damage caused to any property or rights by judicial error as well as those arising from irregularities in the administration of justice to all those affected will be entitled to compensation from the State, except in cases of force majeure under the provisions of this title.
2. In any case, the alleged harm must be actual, economic evaluations and individual in relation to a person or group of people.
3. The mere revocation or annulment of judgments alone does not necessarily entitled to compensation.
The mistake is in terms which recognized the case of TS-statements of 16 June 1995, May 6 and June 26 of 1996 and thirteen of June 1990 and nine, "the judge to disregard the undisputed data in a relationship that breaks the harmony of the legal order or decision misinterprets the legal system, if an interpretation is not sustainable by any method of interpretation applicable in practice judicial.
The irregularities in the administration of justice includes, for Meanwhile, any defect in the performance of courts or tribunals, designed as organic complex which comprises a number of people, services, facilities and activities. Abnormal functioning of a particular case is removed, the wrong decision, to pursue a separate legal treatment. "
is no doubt that the abnormal functioning of the administration of justice is subject to our legal system to a different treatment of judicial error: a) while compensation of error should be preceded by a court decision expressly to recognize, under Article 293.1 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary; b) the claim for damages resulting from irregularities in the administration of justice does not require a prior judicial declaration, but is made directly to the Ministry of Justice in the manner prescribed in Article 292 of the Organic Law Judicial Branch, through a claim of liability on the administration of justice.
.
Friday, January 14, 2011
When To Stop Using Baby Soap
INDEMNITY INSURANCE IS REQUIRED FOR TRAVELERS TRAVELER'S RIGHT TO SUFFER DAMAGE TO A JOURNEY
In this procedure, the appellant now sued the bus company and its insurer, claiming damages for injuries sustained when he was a passenger in one of the buses, as a result of a slowdown given by driver, a claim which was rejected at the contested sentence to be understood that no fault could see the driver, who was forced to make an evasive maneuver unexpected character to dodge the vehicle who joined the movement without signaling properly.
According to the ruling of the Chamber of Civil n º 618/2010, of October 8, 2010, compensation that passengers have a right under the Compulsory Insurance Travelers is not subject to the existence or absence of fault or liability of the driver, is sufficient proof of the damage and the condition of travelers.
In this procedure, the appellant now sued the bus company and its insurer, claiming damages for injuries sustained when he was a passenger in one of the buses, as a result of a slowdown given by driver, a claim which was rejected at the contested sentence to be understood that no fault could see the driver, who was forced to make an evasive maneuver unexpected character to dodge the vehicle who joined the movement without signaling properly.
TS appeal reverses the decision, as the Compulsory Insurance for Travelers provides travelers the right to compensation for injuries suffered in an accident that takes place during the shift in the means of transport, but not is conditional, as does the audience, the lack of "guilt or responsibility" driver. Is only depend on the condition clears traveler with a travel related, that injury resulting from any of the grounds provided for in art. 7 of RD 157/1989, such as shock, overturning or off the road, and is not to cases of exclusion provided for in art. 9 of that Law, which are those in which the insured caused the accident for being drunk or under the influence of drugs and other substances or by committing malicious acts.
Compulsory Insurance Travelers, says Article 1 of Royal Decree 157/1989, is intended to compensate them or their dependents, when they suffer injuries in an accident that takes place during travel in an environment of public transport persons, provided that the circumstances set forth in this regulation. It established a compulsory insurance, under Article 2, in conjunction with Article 4, for all travelers to use means of transport for the public transport of people, including coaches, who at the time of the accident bears the ticket, payment or free (art. 6), whereby the carrier responds whenever there is objective fact of the accident or injury, regardless of fault or negligence of the driver, employer, or employees, or even third, to the limit and conditions set out therein, so that will suffice to prove the status of travelers with the appropriate ticket and that injury resulting from some of the causes provided in Article 7: "collisions, overturning, scope, off the road or driveway, break, explosion, fire, reaction, and external blow any other fault or abnormality that affects or appropriate vehicle" to be compensation. As has been noted by the interpreters of this provision, the regulation uses a dual technique for determining the scope of coverage of this insurance, listing the hypotheses that could be considered accidents, although this constitutes numerus clausus, because it adds a clause open includes events that occurred on other faults or anomalies that affect or are from the vehicle (STS February 27, 2006).
.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Real Metal Tenth Sonic Screwdriver
INFECTIONS AFTER A HIGH doctors do not give right to compensation if WAS A RESULT OF THE HEALING PROCESS
TS understands that in the field of cosmetic surgery but if there is an outcome that does not extend to complications resulting from the surgical process, in particular postoperative complications of surgery in the absence of relationship of causality.
B) FACTS: The plaintiff sued the plastic surgeon, and clinical claims for compensation for damages caused, considering that inadequate postoperative surgical site conducted by the plastic surgeon who had undergone abdominoplasty outcome determined as large scar and a huge deformity, leading to prolonged hospitalization treatment and many have not been able to reduce the unpleasant and inappropriate results of their intervention was just an aesthetic purpose, considering the plaintiff that the surgeon did not act with due diligence, which he also produced significant physical and psychological effects, understanding that the responsibility for the clinic comes from the contractual relationship between it and the patient through the so-called "contract clinic or hospital" without having set all necessary means to avert that outcome, while the result from their doctor's malpractice and that he had not acted in accordance with the lex artis, there, by the nature of the intervention, an outcome, considering also that there was no informed consent because the patient had not been properly informed of the possible complications of the surgery surgery.
Case Instance dismissed the claim in full, noting however that there are serious questions of fact as locative origin and evolution of the infection. So, after explaining that, if any, responsibility for the clinic would be contractual and non contractual because no contract existed between clinical and patient because the doctor who was hired directly by the clinical facilities, means that in the case of a cosmetic surgery, the ratio is close to a lease rather than construction services, which implies an outcome in relation to which, the physician's duty to inform customers about the intervention and its potential complications is even greater.
In this effect, consider that there was informed consent for although written information may be insufficient for generic, it would have been supplemented by numerous interviews between doctor and patient, it acknowledges in its application, saying the intervention has achieved the intended result was the reduction of abdomen, without prejudice to the final aesthetic result was due to a postoperative infection , whose origin has not been determined because they occurred when the patient had already been discharged and there was evidence that the surgery was free of germs without having been able to prove who was the doctor who prescribed the use of diaper elastic closure which would have led to the development of this infection. Discard
also there was a medical malpractice of inadequate treatment of infection. The prescription of a generic antibiotic, when the bacteria is still unknown exactly what caused it, said the sentence could not be considered incorrect and shows that the infection was a consequence of the healing process and not the corrective process, so that for the health of it the doctor had an obligation of means and not results.
C) The Málaga Provincial Court issued a Judgement in which it dismissed the appeal, upholding the Decision of First Instance. Understand the hearing, after considering the evidence examined, that there was informed consent because, in addition to the generic form, there were several conversations between the doctor and the patient explaining everything about the operation and its consequences, with the information provided timely and reasonable relation to the intervention and patient user, to which he highlighted the potential risks, predictable and even frequent consented to the medical act in question, noting that freedom of choice of patients is greater in cases of voluntary medical cases against necessary medical or remedial action. Also fails to note that there is a malpractice, because in the time the patient presented with discomfort, no data revealing the presence of an infection so that prophylactic antibiotic prescription was appropriate, being necessary to perform a crop only when the patient returns with the same discomfort in spite of the antibiotic. The Court further notes that has not been established that the germ had its origin in the hospital. Therefore, concludes that there is no responsibility from the patient or the clinic.
D) TS For the distinction between obligation of means and results can not be maintained in the exercise of medical activities, unless the outcome is agreed or guaranteed, even in cases closer to voluntary medical call necessary, or care, which do not appear very clear differences in the facts, especially since the appointment of the right to health as a condition of being in their aspects, psychological and social, not just physical (SSTS June 30 and November 20, 2009).
physician's obligation is to provide the patient the appropriate means, in particular provide the necessary information, taking into account that doctors operate on people, with or without changes in health, and medical intervention is subject, like all others, the random component himself of it, so that the risks or complications that may arise from the different surgical techniques used, especially aesthetics, are the same as those resulting from other types of surgery: hemorrhage, infection, scarring, pathological or problem with anesthesia. The opposite is set by the physician's responsibility as an objective nature is responsible solely on the result achieved in the implementation of the medical act, equating the damage to the unwanted result or expected, nor even less guaranteed by this intervention, regardless of any assessment of culpability and causation, which ultimately would prevent demonstrate the existence of a medical attitude perfectly adjusted to the art. 
A) The ruling of the Civil Division of the Supreme Court dated September 27, 2010, issued in the appeal 583/2010, states that can not be appreciate the medical liability of the surgeon sued by a cosmetic surgery, when postoperative infection arises after discharge the patient because it does not include any obligation of results, in addition to being accredited infection was a result of the healing process and not the corrective process, so that for the health of her the doctor had an obligation of means rather than result. That ruling
TS
confirms the statement that dismissed the appellant's claim, stating the lack of medical liability of the surgeon who performed a tummy tuck, understanding that the poor results are not attributable to defects or medical facilities in which they conducted the operation, but an infection arose when it was already discharged. Notes the Board that for the conditions relating to failing to declare the existence claimed responsibility, because there a consent from the patient about the risks and complications that the operation entailed, on the other hand, the an antibiotic prescription generic while still unaware of the exact bacteria causing the infection, it can not considered incorrect.
TS
confirms the statement that dismissed the appellant's claim, stating the lack of medical liability of the surgeon who performed a tummy tuck, understanding that the poor results are not attributable to defects or medical facilities in which they conducted the operation, but an infection arose when it was already discharged. Notes the Board that for the conditions relating to failing to declare the existence claimed responsibility, because there a consent from the patient about the risks and complications that the operation entailed, on the other hand, the an antibiotic prescription generic while still unaware of the exact bacteria causing the infection, it can not considered incorrect.
TS understands that in the field of cosmetic surgery but if there is an outcome that does not extend to complications resulting from the surgical process, in particular postoperative complications of surgery in the absence of relationship of causality.
B) FACTS: The plaintiff sued the plastic surgeon, and clinical claims for compensation for damages caused, considering that inadequate postoperative surgical site conducted by the plastic surgeon who had undergone abdominoplasty outcome determined as large scar and a huge deformity, leading to prolonged hospitalization treatment and many have not been able to reduce the unpleasant and inappropriate results of their intervention was just an aesthetic purpose, considering the plaintiff that the surgeon did not act with due diligence, which he also produced significant physical and psychological effects, understanding that the responsibility for the clinic comes from the contractual relationship between it and the patient through the so-called "contract clinic or hospital" without having set all necessary means to avert that outcome, while the result from their doctor's malpractice and that he had not acted in accordance with the lex artis, there, by the nature of the intervention, an outcome, considering also that there was no informed consent because the patient had not been properly informed of the possible complications of the surgery surgery.
Case Instance dismissed the claim in full, noting however that there are serious questions of fact as locative origin and evolution of the infection. So, after explaining that, if any, responsibility for the clinic would be contractual and non contractual because no contract existed between clinical and patient because the doctor who was hired directly by the clinical facilities, means that in the case of a cosmetic surgery, the ratio is close to a lease rather than construction services, which implies an outcome in relation to which, the physician's duty to inform customers about the intervention and its potential complications is even greater.
In this effect, consider that there was informed consent for although written information may be insufficient for generic, it would have been supplemented by numerous interviews between doctor and patient, it acknowledges in its application, saying the intervention has achieved the intended result was the reduction of abdomen, without prejudice to the final aesthetic result was due to a postoperative infection , whose origin has not been determined because they occurred when the patient had already been discharged and there was evidence that the surgery was free of germs without having been able to prove who was the doctor who prescribed the use of diaper elastic closure which would have led to the development of this infection. Discard
also there was a medical malpractice of inadequate treatment of infection. The prescription of a generic antibiotic, when the bacteria is still unknown exactly what caused it, said the sentence could not be considered incorrect and shows that the infection was a consequence of the healing process and not the corrective process, so that for the health of it the doctor had an obligation of means and not results.
C) The Málaga Provincial Court issued a Judgement in which it dismissed the appeal, upholding the Decision of First Instance. Understand the hearing, after considering the evidence examined, that there was informed consent because, in addition to the generic form, there were several conversations between the doctor and the patient explaining everything about the operation and its consequences, with the information provided timely and reasonable relation to the intervention and patient user, to which he highlighted the potential risks, predictable and even frequent consented to the medical act in question, noting that freedom of choice of patients is greater in cases of voluntary medical cases against necessary medical or remedial action. Also fails to note that there is a malpractice, because in the time the patient presented with discomfort, no data revealing the presence of an infection so that prophylactic antibiotic prescription was appropriate, being necessary to perform a crop only when the patient returns with the same discomfort in spite of the antibiotic. The Court further notes that has not been established that the germ had its origin in the hospital. Therefore, concludes that there is no responsibility from the patient or the clinic.
D) TS For the distinction between obligation of means and results can not be maintained in the exercise of medical activities, unless the outcome is agreed or guaranteed, even in cases closer to voluntary medical call necessary, or care, which do not appear very clear differences in the facts, especially since the appointment of the right to health as a condition of being in their aspects, psychological and social, not just physical (SSTS June 30 and November 20, 2009).
physician's obligation is to provide the patient the appropriate means, in particular provide the necessary information, taking into account that doctors operate on people, with or without changes in health, and medical intervention is subject, like all others, the random component himself of it, so that the risks or complications that may arise from the different surgical techniques used, especially aesthetics, are the same as those resulting from other types of surgery: hemorrhage, infection, scarring, pathological or problem with anesthesia. The opposite is set by the physician's responsibility as an objective nature is responsible solely on the result achieved in the implementation of the medical act, equating the damage to the unwanted result or expected, nor even less guaranteed by this intervention, regardless of any assessment of culpability and causation, which ultimately would prevent demonstrate the existence of a medical attitude perfectly adjusted to the art.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)